We all have our missions. Arthur Mijares’s just happens to be really, really controversial: The pious Christian is attempting to change the name of Central California’s Mt. Diablo to Mt. Reagan because he thinks a mountain named after the devil is “derogatory, perjorative, obscene, blasphemous, and profane”.
“I just happen to be an ordinary man that worships God,” Mirajes told the Los Angeles Times. “He gave me this task in my prayer time. I said, ‘Lord, they’re going to think I’m a loon.’ ”
The 80,000 fans on the People Against Renaming Mt. Diablo to Mt. Reagan Facebook page tend to agree.
A few years ago, Mijares petitioned the U.S. Board on Geographic Names to rechristen the peak Mt. Yahweh, but was denied. He then tried Mt. Reagan after the 40th president, but was told a person needed to be dead five years before a mountain could bear their name. Mijares then responded that the devil was a “living person” and thus the mountain should be renamed.
Mt. Diablo, located just east of San Francisco, has one of the biggest “view sheds” in the West. From its summit, on a clear day, you can see more than half of California’s 58 counties. Its current name is a mangled version of the original label given by Spanish soldiers, who trapped some Native Americans they were pursuing in a thicket on the mountain’s slope one night. In the morning, the natives were gone, their escape only possible with the assistance of the devil, it was concluded, so the Spanish called it Monte del Diablo, “thicket of the devil”. Anglos mistook “monte” for mountain and the new name stuck.
The Contra Costa County board of supervisors votes on the issue next Tuesday, March 2, and the recommendation from its legislation committee is to deny the request.
“The existing name has appeared on USGS topographic maps since 1896,” says the board’s next agenda, “and also is on the official Contra Costa County highway map and numerous other maps dating back to the mid-nineteenth century. A large number of local organizations dedicated to astronomy, aviation, surveying, and land preservation have been named for the summit. The name Mount Diablo also applies to one of the three lines of meridian that pass through the State of California, and upon which the numbering of the township and range system is based. The peak of the summit serves as the initial point for the base and meridian lines.”
The supervisors are also considering renaming the peak Mt. John Muir.
If you want to weigh in with the Board on Geographic names, contact:
Lou Yost, Executive Secretary
U.S. Board on Geographic Names
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 523
Reston, VA 20192-0523
BGNEXEC@usgs.gov
Photo used under Creative Commons.
Blue Planet Takes on the Big Red River
The Adventure Life Launches Free Weekly Newsletter
Exploring New Ground in ‘Border Country’
1970s Australian Surfing Sure Looks Good From Here
How To Enjoy Your Outdoor Vacation: Step 1, Take One
Das Goat: The Man Behind the Backcountry Blog
Choppers Pluck 16 From Grand Teton In Dramatic Rescue
World’s Best Bike Handlers Throw Down in Scotland
Tarp Surfing is Blowing Up
MC SpandX Cleans Up With “Get Dirty”
Body Surfing Is Coming Home
Photo of the Day* for July 18, 2010
Madison Avenue Started Co-Opting Surfing A LONG Time Ago








{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
John Muir would be the most appropriate. He was the single biggest influence on NR in the west, especially California. I vote Mt. Muir
While I would certainly not be opposed to a mountain named after Muir or Reagan, changing the 114-year old name of this mountain for silly religious reasons would be ridiculous.
On a side note, he thinks that Mt. Diablo is “blasphemous”, but was ok with Mt. Yahweh? Many observant Jews will not say the name out loud because it is considered blasphemous to do so. Apparently the irony is lost on this gentleman.
hell’s backbone grill?
I vote for Beezlebutte.