The Obama Administration is considering 14 potential national monuments in nine states, including Cedar Mesa and the San Rafael Swell in Utah, and adding significant protection to federal land in numerous other states, according to a leaked Department of the Interior document. Republicans are up in arms over the draft, and officials from Utah are on their way to Washington to complain. The Beehive State is still stinging from Bill Clinton’s 1996 designation of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, which protected 1.7 million acres of land.
Utah Governor Gary Herbert said, “News that the Interior Department is secretly looking at a proposal to lock up public lands in Utah, without seeking input or even having the consideration to contact our state and local officials, is both upsetting and offensive. I will challenge federal officials to explain to me how they could possibly be in a better position to know what’s best for our rural lands than those of us here on the ground in this state.”
A spokesperson for the Interior Department, Kendra Barkoff, told the Salt Lake Tribune, “The preliminary internal discussion draft reflects some brainstorming discussions within [Bureau of Land Management], but no decisions have been made about which areas, if any, might merit more serious review and consideration. Secretary Salazar believes new designations and conservation initiatives work best when they build on local efforts to better manage places that are important to nearby communities.”
Despite its preliminary nature, the draft has sparked a wildfire of outrage among conservatives.
“We need to fight it every step of the way,” said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah.
“We’ve been burned before, and I want to make sure we’re not burned again,” said Utah Rep. Bob Bishop, also head of the Congressional Western Congress.
“You better believe I’ll do everything in my power … to prevent this designation,” said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah.
Environmentalists, of course, were encouraged by the draft. Richard Peterson-Cremer of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance told the Salt Lake Tribune, “Given the attention Congress gives to Utah wilderness, it should come as no surprise that the administration is considering protections for Utah’s incomparable landscapes such as the San Rafael Swell and Cedar Mesa. The success of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument has demonstrated to Utahns and Americans the benefits of protecting these special places.”
Here are the 14 areas under consideration, as described in the memo. For a PDF of the document, click here.
San Rafael Swell, UT
Located in South-Central Utah, the San Rafael Swell is a 75 by 40 mile giant dome made of sandstone, shale and limestone—one of the most spectacular displays of geology in the country. The Swell is surrounded by canyons, gorges, mesas and buttes, and is home to eight rare plant species, desert big horns, coyotes, bobcats, cottontail rabbits, badgers, gray and kit fox, and the golden eagle. Visitors to the area can find ancient Indian rock art and explore a landscape with geographic features resembling those found on Mars.
Montana’s Northern Prairie, MT
The Northern Montana Prairie contains some of the largest unplowed areas of grasslands in the world and some of best habitat regions in all the Great Plains. Unfortunately, we are losing our grasslands and northern prairies at alarming rates, and few opportunities exist to conserve grassland ecosystems and their native biota on large scales. If protected, Montana’s Northern Prairie would connect more than 2,5 million acres of protected grasslands bordering Bitter Creek Wilderness Study Area and Grasslands National Park in Canada. This cross-boundary conservation unit would provide an opportunity to restore prairie wildlife and the possibility of establishing a new national bison range. This landscape conservation opportunity would require conservation easements. willing seller acquisitions, and withdrawal from the public domain.
Lesser Prairie Chicken Preserve, NM
This 58,000-acre Preserve is prime habitat for both the lesser prairie chicken and the sand dune lizard. This area of sand dunes and tall bluestem grasses is ideal habitat for both species. The Preserve contains more than 30 percent of the occupied lesser prairie chicken habitat in southeastern New Mexico. Recent monitoring of the area concluded that this habitat is in good to excellent condition. Protection of this area offers the best opportunity to avoid the necessity of listing either of these species as threatened or endangered.
Berryessa Snow Mountains, CA
The public lands of the Berryessa Snow Mountain region stretch from the lowlands of Putah Creek below Lake Berryessa, across remote stretches of Cache Creek, and up to the peaks of Goat Mountain and Snow Mountain, This vast expanse—nearly 500,000 acres in the wild heart of California’s inner Coast Ranges — provides habitat and critical long-term movement corridors for many species of wildlife and an unusually rich part of the California Floristic Province, a biological hotspot of global importance.
Heart of the Great Basin, NV
The Heart of the Great Basin contains Nevada’s wild heart — a globally unique assemblage of cultural, wildlife, and historical values. Here, Toiyabe, Toquima, and Monitor peaks tower to 12,000 feet. Thousands of petroglyphs and stone artifacts provide insight to the area’s inhabitants from as long as 12,000 years ago, The region contains varied ecosystems including alpine tundra, rushing creeks, aspen groves, and high desert sage grouse habitat. The area is also a center of climate change scientific research. (e.g., Great Basin Pika is a keystone species for climate research), and one of North America’s least appreciated wildland mosaics.
Otero Mesa, NM
Stretching over 1.2 million acres, Otero Mesa is home to more than 1,000 native wildlife species. including black-tailed prairie dogs, mountain lions, desert mule deer, and the only genetically pure herd of pronghorn antelope in New Mexico. These vast desert grasslands of Otero Mesa, once found throughout the region, have disappeared or been reduced to small patches unable to support native wildlife, Otero Mesa is one of the last remaining vestiges of grasslands — America’s most endangered ecosystem.
Northwest Sonoran Desert, AZ
The Sonoran Desert is the most biologically diverse of all North American deserts. This area west of Phoenix is largely remote and undeveloped, with a high concentration of pristine desert wilderness landscapes. There is potential for up to 500,000 acres of new wilderness and National Conservation Area designations.
Owyhee Desert, OR/NV
Last year Congress protected a significant portion of the Owyhee Canyonlands region in Idaho. However, a significant portion of the Owyhee region in Oregon and Nevada remains unprotected. The Owyhee Desert is one of the most remote areas in the continental United States, characterized by juniper covered deserts, natural arches, mountains and ancient lava flows. The many branching forks of the Owyhee River form deep, sheer-walled canyons between desert wilderness and entice river runners from around the Nation. The Owyhees are home to the world’s largest herd of California bighorn sheep, elk, deer, cougar. Redband trout, sage-grouse and raptors.
Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, CA (expansion)
In 2000, Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument was established to protect the extraordinary biodiversity and vegetation found in southwestern Oregon. Unfortunately, because of political constraints, the Monument’s southern boundary was artificially established at the California State line. Therefore, the Monument does not include the ecologically important Klamath River tributaries and cuts out sections of important no-regions from protection, Connectivity of landscapes is essential to protect and maintain healthy wildlife populations especially in the face of global climate change. In addition, this expansion could connect Cascade-Siskiyou with the proposed Siskiyou Crest National Monument. Expansions on the Oregon side may also be worth consideration.
Vermillion Basin, CO
The Vermillion Basin, located in northwest Colorado, is a rugged and wild landscape containing sweeping sagebrush basins, ancient petroglyph-filled canyons and whitewater rivers. Besides its scenic qualities, the basin is a critical migration corridor and winter ground for big game species such as elk, mule deer and pronghorn, in addition to being vital sage grouse habitat. This unique high desert basin is currently under threat of oil and gas development, which will forever alter the region.
Bodie Hills, CA
The remote Bodie Hills, located in the eastern Sierra Nevada, provide habitat for the imperiled sage grouse and the iconic pronghorn antelope, rare in California. The ghost town of Bodie State Historic Park, managed by the State of California, lies at the center of the Bodie Hills. Bodie State Historic Park is known as the best preserved ghost town in the West and receives several hundred thousand visits annually. Numerous gold mining operations have been proposed in the Bodies, and a new proposal is pending. Bodie Hills provides an opportunity to link both ecotourism and cultural tourism providing benefits to the surrounding communities.
The Modoc Plateau, CA
Tucked away in California’s northeast corner, the Modoc Plateau contains some of the State‘s most spectacular and remote lands. This wild and largely undiscovered region features an array of natural riches: unbroken vistas, abundant wildlife, and millions of acres of intact, undisturbed landscapes. Spanning close to three million acres of ‘public land that is laden with biological and archeological treasures, the Modoc Plateau is one of the State’s most important natural landscapes. The crown jewel of these areas – the Skedaddle Mountains – covers close to a half- million acres in California and Nevada. The California portion alone is the second largest unprotected wilderness area in the state.
Cedar Mesa region, UT
For more than 12,000 years, generations of families from Paleo-Indian big game hunters to Mormon settlers traveled to the area now within southeastern Utah’s Cedar Mesa region. Their stories are now buried among the area‘s estimated hundreds of thousands of prehistoric and historic sites. Cedar Mesa also contains thousands of largely intact cliff dwellings and open-air sites built between All 750 and 1300 by later prehistoric farmers known as the Ancestral Puebloans or Anasazi.
San Juan Islands, WA
This cluster of hundreds of islands along the nation’s northern border contains a wealth of resources. The deep channels between islands and placid, reef-studded bays are home to myriad marine species and support major migratory routes for Orcas. The islands contain healthy pine and fir forests which protect a wide variety of wildlife species. The outstanding scenery and a historic lighthouse support diverse recreation opportunities. This area also supports sailing and sea kayaking opportunities that are unique in the Northwest.
Conservation Designations: Areas worthy of protection that are ineligible for Monument Designation and unlikely to receive legislative protection in the near term.
Bristol Bay Region, AK
Bristol Bay, located in southwest Alaska, is pristine wild country encompassing AIaska‘s largest lake, rugged snow-capped peaks and tundra laced with countless winding rivers. Bristol Bay has been called the world’s greatest salmon fishery, home to the largest sockeye salmon fisheries and one of the largest king salmon runs in the world. The region is also home to caribou, brown and black bear, moose, sandhill cranes, and myriad migratory birds. Conservationists have expressed that Bristol Bay is threatened by proposed open pit gold mining, which would forever alter this pristine and delicate watershed, potentially exposing the salmon and trout habitat to acid mine drainage.
Teshekpuk Lake, AK
Teshekpuk Lake is a 22-mile wide lake located on the north slope of Alaska. Due to climate change and loss of habitat, Teshekpuk Lake has been called one of the most important areas for wildlife population survival in the entire Arctic. The lake and surrounding land is both a migration and calving ground for 46,000 caribou and home to 90,000 summer geese. In addition, hundreds of species of birds migrate from six continents to spend part of the year at Teshekpuk Lake.
Red Desert, WY
The Red Desert‘s rich landscape offers spectacular desert structures and wildlife habitat. The Desert provides world class pronghorn and elk hunting; the area is home to the largest desert elk herd in North America and the migration path for 50,000 pronghorn antelope. Early explorers, pioneers, and Mormon settlers used the unique features in the Red Desert as landmarks to guide them Westward. The Pony Express Trail traverses the northern section of the Red Desert. One of the unique features in the Red Desert is Adobe Town, an astonishing and remote set of badlands and geologic formations. Visitors can see fossils of long-extinct mammals, reptiles and invertebrates.
All photos used under Creative Commons license.
Blue Planet Takes on the Big Red River
The Adventure Life Launches Free Weekly Newsletter
Exploring New Ground in ‘Border Country’
1970s Australian Surfing Sure Looks Good From Here
How To Enjoy Your Outdoor Vacation: Step 1, Take One
Das Goat: The Man Behind the Backcountry Blog
Choppers Pluck 16 From Grand Teton In Dramatic Rescue
World’s Best Bike Handlers Throw Down in Scotland
Tarp Surfing is Blowing Up
MC SpandX Cleans Up With “Get Dirty”
Body Surfing Is Coming Home
Photo of the Day* for July 18, 2010
Madison Avenue Started Co-Opting Surfing A LONG Time Ago








{ 20 comments… read them below or add one }
Let’s cross our fingers. Many of these places have needed additional protection for a very long time. I just visited the Deseret News article on this leaked document, and as usual the wackos in UT are completely up in arms about the feds ’stealing’ ‘their’ lands. Hey, these are federal lands and they have never belonged to the current residents of UT. So annoying to hear white people talk about how ‘their’ land is being stolen!
The ignorance of individuals fighting the protection of these areas is staggering. If you are passionate about protecting a bit more of our wild places, get out your checkbook, pen and bullhorn and put some energy behind this. So you have some perspective, only 2.39% of the lower 48’s (and UT is only 2%!) land mass is designated wilderness – and there is very little more area left that could even qualify for listing. Don’t wait to get involved, it’s not going to last long.
Jay, Our efforts will cancel each other out. I’ll be supporting the other side because I want to enjoy OUR national forests and not be made into a criminal for recreating. 2.39% is too much wilderness for me.
I’m not a repub, but I’m jeering too.
Why in the world would you jeer along with the haters?
Because monuments typically restrict access for public use and recreation of the forest. I live in a monument and have seen the adverse affects to this community. I do not like what restricting recreational access does to the condition of the trails when former stewards from various recreational groups are restricted, and the result it has on tourism and the local economy.
I also have an issue with politicians making policies that do not make sense and in areas they have never been. I’d rather see these designations go through the house and senate rather than being a closed door executive proclamation.
I HATE WILDERNESS DESIGNATION and monuments are typically more strict than wilderness. I want to enjoy the forest all my life and I may not always be physically able to travel to these areas only on foot. I prefer riding my mountain bike, motorcycle, snowmobile, and snowboard on public lands and I am fed up with the restrictive policies and scare tactics that the Sierra Club and Wilderness Society, among others have employed to keep people out of the forest with wilderness and monument designations. It’s just another way to keep people out…. See More
I voted for Obama and Clinton, but I do not agree with mass monument designations. I just want to play on public lands and I want others to be able to enjoy the forest too, and not just on foot
Thanks much for the thoughtful response. I guess the whole point is to restrict access. Right now only about 2% of UT lands and under 3% have wilderness designation in the lower 48 over all. The Wilderness act of 1964 is a very flawed document, no doubt, but until it gets modified we have to work with and respect it for what it is. If we don’t protect this stuff, our desire to enjoy it now exactly the way we want may mean that it’s not there for future generations.
Monument and Park designation is more restrictive in some ways – and yet there are full-on malls in many National Parks. I would really like to see our generation come up with some changes to how we manage our public lands that still retain some wilderness attributes, instead of just accepting the way things are and being pissed off.
Unfortunately motorcycles, snowmobiles and mountain bikes are counter to preservation of wilderness character (which is something that you have to value for this to be relevant) – but so are horses in my opinion – and they ARE allowed in wilderness and Monuments/Parks. So, there are inconsistencies in all of this and we the people have the right/ability to work for change…. See More
Thanks for clarifying! I am going to go ride my mountain bike….
Jay, I agree, the Wilderness Act of 64 is not relevant anymore and needs revision, but I’m not holding my breathe for it to change. I guess I’m a bit cynical and just want to play, not politic. I don’t value wilderness designation, but I certainly value the forest and I don’t think that motorcycles, snowmobiles, mountain bikes or horses (which I … See Moredon’t like, but I do support their right to access the forest) adversely affect my forest experience and I’m tired of all the excuses that are made to exclude people from enjoying our public lands.
Fact is, hardly anyone uses the forest. Plus everything requires maintenance and trails are no different if a lot of feet have traveled on it or tires, hoofs or tracks (snowmobiles leave no trail damage since our trails melt), or just fallen trees and natural erosion. If we do not have dedicated people who use these trails, become stewards, and give back by maintaining them, they will be lost for future generations as well.
I hope you had a great ride and I look forward to enjoying the forest in my backyard this weekend. Cheers!
Let’s rock the house party Franklin Delano Roosevelt style. Hands up in the air, and let bipartisanship be a cool concept to think about some day while exploring new protected areas. Let us have a consensus of the educated.
GOBAMA!
I’m only going to refer to the San Rafael Swell as I have followed this area closely over the years.
The San Rafael Monument would create an economic boon for Emery County. A national park anywhere but Utah. I would say stick to Republican Governor Mike Levitt’s initial monument proposal (~ 750,000 acres), which lost by 76 votes; in a vote where only 1,400 people voted.
The entire reason San Rafael National Monument lost the vote was that in the public scoping meetings the BLM would not agree to any fixed boundaries such as those proposed by the governor. That gave the OHV crowd all the ammo they needed. A bunch of us in the state testified at these meetings showing that given this configuration there would be minimum negative impact to the state but…..we were told in front of the audience that the borders we were using in our GIS analyzes were meaningless. Basically elements of the BLM got greedy, some stuff could have been tweaked after the vote but noooooooo.
Relative to tourism, a major highway goes through the center and Amtrak skirts the northwest side for 50 miles. It’s all in the management plan; the feds and Utah need to keep the principles of mutual self interest in mind.
Green River, Utah, has the infrastructure to benefit, as does Price in Carbon County and Hanksville in Wayne County (oh yes…they did not get to vote). We need to to promote interpretation of sites on the swell, promote tours, and interpretive centers like the John Wesley Powell River History Museum and the Museum of the San Rafael.
Garfield and Kane County are benefiting from GSENM. But perhaps the state needs to get some real estate in exchange near I-15 on Hhighway 10 and near its communities around the swell so local residents do not get forced out by rising real estate values.
I’ve talked to lots of people in Green River, the gateway to the swell and from the guy at the gas station to the folks at city hall, they can see where monument status would be of benefit.
And the OHV people need to help police the OHV routes, they cannot be simple access points to get back further and tear up the landscape. Sure, it is a few bad apples, but it is only a few bad apples that hijack planes.
This vision will never die, so we had better work together to make it something we can all live with. Perhaps a plan like the revised Washington County Land Bill that Senator Bennett put together.
Part of the problem with managing these areas is that is no money to manage them, so it it is easiest to lock it up and let no one use it. Simple economics. The final Bennett Washington land use plan was modeled after Senator Reed’s “Vegas” Clark County land use plan, which took the profits from selling public land on the margins of Las Vegas to fund long term management of the lands protected by the act. A good example of mutual self interest working toward a solution that benefits all parties.
We do want to maintain access to the area; protect the area, not hide it in a safe deposit box. The critical thing is …to work with the various stake holders upfront (not impossible), such that all our citizens and the world benefits from this treasure.
Wow, what does the designation of National Monument mean for the people residing there? Property rights? etc…For example, here on Orcas Island, we have a year round population of about 5000 which swells to about 20,000 in the summer. We do have a beautiful state park as well – why would we need to be a monument? As a community I think we do a good job of stewardship for the land already..This could get really contentious.
PS. Orcas is the largest of the SanJuan Islands, although, not the most populated.
I am ecstatic that Obama would consider providing Federal protection over Bristol Bay!! As a life-long resident of Alaska, and from a fishing heritage that spans over 9,000 years in that region (yes, I am AK Native), it’s about time that leaders would stick up for us “little people” who depend on these resources both for our commercial and for subsistence livelihoods.
Gobama! I am so pleased that we have a President with enough guts to stand up to multinational mining companies who have been railroading indigenous peoples for hundreds of years.
A Northwest Sonoran Desert monument is much needed and I’d certainly appreciate it. Fingers solidly crossed.
the last thing we need in this country right now is for the federal government to take control of anything more AT ALL. our country is on the verge of collapse and you guys are talking about adding wilderness and having the feds spend more money on something that benefits only liberal greenies who like to look at pictures on National Geographic and protect lizards and wolves. RECREATION, OHV, Hunting and Fishing use of federal lands promote conservation dollars for habitat and wildlife. the government should be selling federal lands to generate revenue instead of increasing taxes and stifiling our economy. in Nevada over 87% off all the land in the state is federal or state land. bring our troops home FROM EVERYWHERE, let the world police their own crazies cause we got enough of our own here. i feel bad for Haitians, but we got people here who have been unemployed for over 2 years, are eating cat food and their unemployment is fixing to completely dry up. WE HAVE SERIOUS HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES right here at home that need addressing and we just keep doling it out to people who really hate us. how much aid and assistance did we get from anywhere when Katrina hit??? the repsonse to tragedy in a foreign country by our government far surpasses what they give to our own people. get your heads out of the sand or the clouds or wherver they are.
Thousands of people live on the San Juan Islands. I guess they’ll be evicted, right?
Megalogmaniacs in DC “know what’s best for the states more than they do,” right?
jeff owens I could not agree with you more. I too am from Orcas Island and am a member of a community that feels passionate about keeping our island and our neighbors islands as beautiful as possible. We do a bang up job wrestling with the issues, deciding the right thing to do locally. The TAKING of our land by presidential fiat in this economy and global environment is ill intended and concieved and a distraction from the real plagues on our land.
Please Mr President take care business before you “go out and play”.
the taking of our lands? secretly locking up public lands? i believe these lands belong to the citizens of the united states. sorry, locals that are using and abusing, those are our lands and our children’s lands!
I agree with Ken, Smitty and especially Jeff!! Well said Jeff! I live in Solano County and love the outdoors. I cannot support the idea of making the Berryessa Snow Mountain area a National Monument. It really scares me to see what is happening in the state of California. As an avid Trailrider (yes I ride a dirtbike) I have to drive 1 1/2 to 2 hours (so I spend 4 hours just driving to and fro) to get to the nearest decent riding area — Stonyford in Mendecino Nat’l forest is my favorite place to go riding with a few of my lifelong friends. I also have three little boys, 6yrs old and 4 yr old twins and I am looking forward to the day when they are ready to go riding there with me. If this area is given monument status it will NEVER HAPPEN. The most detrimental impact we are having on the forest is by constantly closing the OHV areas we had. One by one they are slipping through our fingers and this has had a negative impact on the remaining OHV areas because of overuse of the few remaining trailsystems.
I also love to go boating with family and friends on Berryessa. Mostly we just boat out to our favorite cove, drop anchor and enjoy the lake. The kids get to swim, play, and enjoy the outdoors. Would we still be able to take our boat out to the lake? Its like a minivacation, and its how we enjoy ourselves. It just feels like another freedom lost.
I’m all for caring for the land. My children have been taught never to litter, leave no trace, and respect the land. It is unfair to say that unless you want to hike you cannot enjoy these “public” lands. I so sick of this government intrusion into our lives. One by one it is taking the rights of citizens away. Soon, all I’ll be able to do is work and pay taxes. I guess that’s what they want us to do, while our kids get overweight in front of the tube, playing X Box. Please, please stop taking other people’s rights for granted.
Sorry for the rant, drove 4 hours and wasted $40 in gas (roundtrip) to Stonyford yesterday just to be turned around at the gate…they changed the rule after rain. Used to be closed for 48 hours. Now, with no notification I was told its been changed to 5 days!!
As I said on another site, let’s take san francisco, chicago, seattle, taos, roswell, santa cruz, berkeley, and every other liberal hotbed and turn them into national monuments. After all, they would be great places to visit as long as you didn’t have to be around the libs. Let’s then move the libs to the proposed national monuments and watch them get lost. Then they would stop bothering us!
I would be sure to visit the new national monuments as that is something I like to do. I would very much enjoy spoiling those remote areas and burning precious gasoline in the process. I am sure that those advocating for the land to become national monuments long ago parked their cars and moved into caves so as to reduce their carbon footprint. Please tell me that I am correct!
Aside from the backwards right-wingers who claim they want to “protect” these lands (for what? ORV driving? government giveaway cattle grazing? or just some strange “principle?”) the vast majority of Americans today and among the generations to come in the future will applaud the expansion of protection of our country’s greatest treasures. Many, many Americans will benefit from monument designation – including those folks trying to run businesses and make a living in the areas of the monuments.