Critics Allege Wildlife Photo of the Year Was Faked

by steve casimiro on December 29, 2009 · 13 comments

13 responses

It’s a stunning image, but an award-winning photograph of a wolf jumping over a farm gate is being attacked as a misrepresentation—that the wild wolf is in fact a trained wolf from a wildlife park. Two months after Spanish photographer José Luis Rodrîguez’s picture of an Iberian wolf won the world’s most prestigious wildlife photography competition, held by the BBC Wildlife Magazine and Britain’s Natural History Museum, a Finnish magazine accused Rodrîguez of setting up the shot.

Rodrîguez denies wrongdoing.

Organizers are investigating the allegations. “Using a trained animal model would break the competition rules and we take any such allegation very seriously. Consequently, we have been looking into the details of this claim, and we are reconvening our judging panel as soon as possible to consider the information that we have obtained,” said a spokesman for the museum.

In describing the award, organizers wrote:

“José Luis visualized this image many years ago, when Iberian wolves first returned to Ávila in the Castilla y León region of northern Spain, and cattle ranchers declared war on them. His idea was a picture that would symbolize the ancient conflict between humans and wolves, while showing the beauty and strength of this fabled animal. But it took a long time to find the ideal location, let alone a wolf that would jump a gate. His chance came when he found a landowner who was happy to have both the wolves and José Luis on his property, and also had the ideal setting: a copse and an ancient, disused cattle corral.

“José Luis started by placing meat in the corral. Once he knew a male wolf was visiting regularly, jumping the gate, he began to introduce the bits of equipment needed to set up a camera trap. At first, the wolf didn’t like the flash triggered by the trip beam, but after a few weeks he took no notice of the light or the clicks of the hidden digital camera. Now that the wolf was happy and the camera positioning was right, it was time to take the final picture with a medium-format camera. When the first transparencies arrived back from the lab, José Luis was overjoyed to find he finally had the picture he had dreamt of.”

Wolf experts say that jumping a fence is uncharacteristic of the species—they are far more likely to squeeze between the bars of the gate.

Suomen Luonto published the accusations on its website after being approached by a number of Spanish photographers. As evidence, it compared closeup photos of the wolf in Rodrîguez’s shot to a wolf named Ossian from a Madrid wildlife park. The creatures are strikingly similar, but the tame wolf features a mangled ear, which the critics say could have been damaged in a fight. When the ear was damaged would help clarify the issue, but the Finnish magazine apparently didn’t contact the wildlife park. Efforts by The Adventure Life to reach the park have been unsuccessful.

Animals’ bodies can vary tremendously throughout the year depending on food—though it’s probably less of a factor in a wildlife park—but even a brief inspection shows Ossian to be thicker, stockier, and more heavily furred than the jumping wolf. Markings on its back appear to be darker, too. Suomen Luonto says the differences can be explained by summer and winter coats.

The name of Rodrîguez’s winning image is “The Storybook Wolf”. It will be a sad irony indeed if it turns out to have been faked.


Photos from Suomen Luonto website comparing award-winning wolf and wolf from wildlife park.


Related Posts with Thumbnails

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

Justin Rains December 29, 2009 at 12:24

It’s a sweet shot! But I guess if it is deemed a fake the award should go to the runner up.

steve casimiro December 29, 2009 at 13:13

@marijolamarche just asked me via Twitter what I think about the photo. What I think is that if it really was shot as described, it was a breach of ethics and never should have won the award. There’s nothing authentic about baiting wildlife for photos. As a friend of mine put it, you might as well be shooting a unicorn jumping over a fence for all the connection to reality. And again, if it was shot as described, Rodrîguez didn’t just bait the wolf, he habituated it to his flash. Best case, that’s questionable, but I’d call it just plain wrong. The fact that the wolf looks just like a trained dog in the circus should tell us something.

So, in my opinion, it doesn’t matter whether it was a “wild” or “tame” wolf. Either way, the image is false.

Jillian R. December 29, 2009 at 13:37

I have to agree with Steve. We’re taught in photojournalism that you can’t set up a shot unless you plan on calling it a “photo illustration.”

In any case, if the photographer baited the wolf, the photo should not have won the prize. It shouldn’t be called fake, but it was a set-up. For wildlife to be properly photographed, it has to be in their environment with no outside stimuli from the photographer (beyond what is inescapable, such as being noticed by the subject). I believe that is the spirit of the contest and while Rodriguez may not be in violation of a rule against “fake” wildlife, he’s not adhering to the spirit of the rules either.

steph Davis December 29, 2009 at 13:44

sigh.

Kimberlee December 29, 2009 at 14:18

I totally agree with Steve’s comment. Trained animal or wild, it was still staged and not an authentic wildlife shot.

Sinuhe December 29, 2009 at 16:51

Photographers are scum… Not to be trusted.

steve casimiro December 29, 2009 at 19:22

Amen, brother.

Peter Z December 30, 2009 at 01:14

I agree with Steve, Jillian & Kimberlee.

It’s an amazing image for sure, but faked or not, it’s not a true wildlife photo!

Randy C January 15, 2010 at 13:08

How is this different than feeding birds, as with the BBC Young Photographer of the Year winner Fergus Gill for his depiction “The Clash of the Yellowhammers”?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8318226.stm

It’s baiting and created human-influenced feeding habits.

Bill January 20, 2010 at 14:43

I found it odd from the beginning. The wold is lit from below but the fence is lit from above. Now that is odd and should have set anyone’s alarms bells ringing. What on earth were the judges thinking off?

John G January 20, 2010 at 21:20

While the original photo looks staged, the captive wolf has a shorter muzzle, has had a hematoma in his right ear, and looks significantly older than the contest wolf.

Further, the stone walls in the Madrid natural park bear only a superficial resemblance to the stone wall and gate in the contest photograph– in the park, it’s a small pile of small/medium sized rocks, in the contest photo, it’s a wall-shaped stack of larger rocks with lichen on them (the supposed site of the photograph is in the original article).

There may be fakery going on here, but I don’t think these two are the same wolf.

FireMan January 21, 2010 at 03:57

These are two different wolfs. They don’t resemble at all.

M. I. M. January 28, 2010 at 02:23

Well, John G wrote exactly what I wanted about the wolves. They are different. However, this baiting thing is what makes the picture false.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: